""I.ve know John for over 30 years, and he has proven over and over again his expertise in selection.  His experience in diagnosing key issues..."
Bill J. Bonnstetter

""We use Talent Management Plus not only for our new hires, but to benchmark all the positions in our company. This resource has been incredibly..."
Doug Selby

more...
Dunns: 030313530

Subjective Performance Evaluations

Return to Blogs
Published: November 17, 2011 12:56 PM

One of the challenges managers have when doing performance evaluations is controlling the emotions the process creates.  Most managers do not like doing them because of the emotional roller coaster they create.  It is curious how biases create emotions that are hard to control.

The dictionary defines the word subjective as not impartial – based on a person’s opinions or feelings rather than on facts or evidence.  The very reason employees become disgruntled after performance reviews is there were not as many facts discussed, as there were feelings.  When a manager is asked about a person is doing, often the answer is “ok but I just feel h/she could be doing more.”

Facts about a person performance will trump emotions every time, and will reduce the emotional stress for both parties. 

How do you get at the facts of a person’s performance?

Begin with the job description.  How current is it.  Most companies do not keep their organizational charts up to date along with that the job descriptions to go with it. Jobs change to meet the current needs especially in small business that can change their focus quickly.  This presents a problem for about 70% of the employees in most companies who are in support roles. They are in the customer service department, the warehouse, the delivery person, accounting, etc.  These folks, if they are performing well, do not like change that is not explained to them.  Their behavioral style that allows them to excel in being service oriented makes them very uncomfortable with sudden changes.

When it comes time for performance reviews this group of employees responds much better to the facts about their performance level, which should come from how well, are they performing the duties and responsibilities as described in the job description?  The job description should to be referred to often by the manager and employee so that both parties will stay job focused, and less emotionally focused.

When positions are benchmarked by company stakeholders the process delivers additional information the manager and employee can use to determine performance based on facts. 



Return to Blogs


Add Comment
Name:

Comment:


Categories


Recent Blogs


Proven technology, proven results; elevate the way you find superior performers. Our blogs will keep you up to date.